Containment Early Cold war Essay -- miscellaneous

Containment Early wintry warIn the early years of the Cold War, both the Truman and Eisenhower giving medications pursued a policy of containment to counter perceived Soviet aggression. Generally, the presidential administrations pursued this policy to maintain stability in the internationalist arena, to maintain a balance of effect, and withal in a sense, to limited disapproval of totalitarian, non-democratic regimes. Containment was expressed through a variety of policies and institutions economic, political and, of course, soldiery. The ship canal the early presidential administrations defined and implemented containment strategy inevitably changed in focus, impressiveness, and emphasis over time. While both external and internal reasons accounted to an uttermost for the specifics of the containment policies of both administrations, the Truman administration was more than touch on with maintaining a balance of power within the international community than necessarily ap peasing internal pressures, specially fiscal pressures. The Eisenhower administration, on the other hand, assigned a greater importance to domestic political sympathies in formulating its containment policies. First I will precis the differences of the 2 administrations, and then I will argue that the differences in the two administrations stem from their predominant make fors whereas external threats mainly shaped the Truman administrations containment policy, internal politics mainly shaped the Eisenhower administrations containment policy. First of all, both administrations had different economic priorities. Although Truman was concerned about keeping taxes low and government spending capped, he also saw the need for military expenditures in Europe and Asia to keep an seemly balance of power. Truman implemented an assortment of aid packages to Europe and Asia, in effect, to alleviate those countries help themselves. He saw economic stability as innate for peace and stabil ity in the intentional arena. Moreover, he saw heavy(a) aid to these countries as a way to subtly influence the political orientation of their constituents. Furthermore, Truman accepted ongoing government economic intervention as an curb way to direct resources within the economy. Eisenhower, on the other hand, was more implicated in a conservative fiscal policy, and tight control on government spending. He was more intent on trading with the countrie... ...endencies, they took their influence for policy from different sources. Thus, their foreign policy had a different approach. The Truman administration was more concerned with Stalins expansionist tendencies, and sought to contain him by the best means possible, which he considered to be conventional warfare. Truman used palaver and threat to fail his policy to Congress and the American people, because his policy was expensive. Eisenhower, on the other hand, was more concerned with his popularity and cutting taxes than purs uing expensive overseas militaries. He was adapted to cut costs by using thermonuclear capabilities as a deterrent against the Soviets. Thus, he used a more capital-intensive, and less labor-intensive means to detract Soviet expansion. Because he was able to cut costs so effectively, it was not as important for him to sell him policy to the public. That is namely why Eisenhower was such a popular president.Referenceswww.globalsecurity.org/military/ library/report/1992/MJA.htmwww.nwc.navy.mil/CNCSCaseStudies/cases/case09.htmwww.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/kbank/profiles/truman/regentsprep.org/Regents/ushisgov/themes/ presidentialactions/commander.cfm