Zero Tolerance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

goose egg Tolerance - Essay ExampleIn Simons case, he had participated in contravening a alliances internet policy (Gerson, Parker, Volokh, Halloran, Cherkasky, 2006). Simon had utilized the keep companys intranet to communicate with an unauthorized personality out of the network. The misdemeanor was gross since the company had sculptured clear conditions about the policy. This included clear indication of the relevant consequences. The caution had notable controls in the same situation. To begin with, it laid a clear policy. This policy indicated that it banned ingestion of the companys internet and intranet in communication under un stated uses. The company also stated that unwarranted internet use and e-mailing could result into the termination of employment. In addition, the company busy strategic measures of terminating Simons tenure. The management made an indirect approach of firing Simon. This would be followed by an explanation of the act that guide to the tenure ter mination. There are controlling and coordination skills that are necessary in this situation. To begin with, it is vital that the company harnesses a proper communication channel. This is a system whereby each employee has adequate information about the companys policies. In this perspective, the company can invest in an automatic e-mail system that updates on companys policies and the consequences of breaching the provisions. Besides, meetings, between the management and employees, should be regular for physical information and discussion. In received instances, zero tolerance policies might be stringent. In this sense, discussion can modify the policies to suit octuple scenarios. It is crucial that employees design and agree to zero tolerance policies. This would absolve the management from blame in cases of sober consequences to employees. The solution that the company employed had particular details. The management strove to strike a vital point in terminating Simons tenure. Companies would usually employ sane and rational employees. This means that it could apply formal means of communication with an affected employee (Brooks & Dunn, 2009). Such communication would take the letter or e-mail method for information. Simon could not pass on possessed the option of not leaving the company. The use of guards was an informal sense of terminating Simons employment. It is devoid of young managements skills since it seeks to be autocratic oriented. This is because the guards could have employed forceful means in case of resistance by Simon. Element of force is evident from the communication between the security officers and the management. The management was monitoring Simons chemical reaction for an additional strategy. However, the company had a proper strategy of informing Simon. To begin with, this demonstrates of zero tolerance on certain violations. It also highlights that the former(a) employees should educate themselves of companys policies. However, the company can utilize other strategies. This pertains to drawing the same sense on a companys reputation. The vital element in zero tolerance policies should regard their intentions. Zero tolerance policies should seek to highlight the sense of certain behavior. This is various from the focus of merely humiliating employees. Policies should concentrate on processes rather than the consequences of the same. In this view, the company could have employed an alternative strategy of terminating Simons benefits. Termination of benefits could achieve the orientation of the breach. In case of an internets condition, Simon could have been barred from the connection. Besides, the company could lock Simon from accessing certain information. Additionally,